Skip to main content

Exit WCAG Theme

Switch to Non-ADA Website

Accessibility Options

Select Text Sizes

Select Text Color

Website Accessibility Information Close Options
Close Menu
The Law Office of Israel Garcia
  • Call Today for a Free Consultation
  • ~
  • Immediate Appointment Available

Bexar County Semi-Truck Accident Lawyer

Commercial trucking litigation in Bexar County moves through a legal system that has seen its share of catastrophic collision cases along IH-35, Loop 1604, and US-90. When a semi-truck accident leaves someone with serious injuries, the path to compensation runs directly through a web of federal regulations, Texas state law, and the specific investigative practices that local law enforcement agencies use to document these crashes. The Law Office of Israel Garcia has spent more than 20 years representing injury victims in South-Central Texas, and our experience as a Bexar County semi-truck accident lawyer includes understanding exactly how these cases are built, and where those initial investigations can leave critical gaps that affect the outcome of a civil claim.

How Local Law Enforcement Builds the Initial Record, and Why That Record Is Never the Full Picture

When a semi-truck collision occurs on a Bexar County roadway, the Texas Department of Public Safety or San Antonio Police Department typically takes the lead on documentation. Officers complete a CR-3 crash report, the standardized form used statewide, and that document becomes the foundation on which insurance adjusters and defense attorneys will build their early arguments. The CR-3 captures unit descriptions, contributing factors, and a diagram of the scene, but it does not capture the hours of electronic data stored inside the truck’s Engine Control Module or the Hours of Service logs the driver was required to maintain under 49 C.F.R. Part 395.

That gap matters enormously. A crash report that lists “failure to control speed” as the contributing factor tells almost nothing about whether the driver had been awake for 17 consecutive hours in violation of federal Hours of Service limits. It says nothing about whether the carrier had received prior safety violations from the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration or whether the truck’s braking system had failed a pre-trip inspection that the driver never documented. Law enforcement agencies are not equipped, and frankly not responsible, for conducting the kind of forensic investigation that a civil truck accident case requires. That responsibility falls on the injured party’s legal team, and it has to begin quickly before electronic data is overwritten.

The trucking company’s insurer typically dispatches an accident reconstruction team within hours of a serious collision. That team is working to protect the carrier’s interests. An attorney representing the injured victim needs to move with the same urgency, sending a spoliation letter demanding preservation of the Electronic Logging Device data, dash camera footage, maintenance records, and the driver’s qualification file. These are not optional documents. Federal regulations under 49 C.F.R. Part 390 require carriers to maintain them, and their content can be the difference between proving negligence and losing a case on disputed facts.

Applying Federal and Texas Standards to Establish Carrier Liability

Texas law governs the civil negligence claim, but the standard of care for commercial truck drivers is defined almost entirely by federal regulation. The Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations establish hours of service limits, weight restrictions, cargo securement standards, and drug and alcohol testing requirements. When a carrier or driver violates any of these regulations and that violation contributes to a crash, the violation itself is evidence of negligence per se under Texas law. That means the plaintiff does not have to prove what constitutes reasonable conduct. The federal standard already defines it.

Bexar County jury pools have seen truck accident cases before, and defense attorneys know that jurors in this market respond to concrete, documented proof. Pointing to a specific FMCSA violation code, a failed roadside inspection recorded in the FMCSA’s Safety Measurement System, or a pattern of out-of-service orders against the carrier carries far more weight than generalized arguments about driver negligence. The Law Office of Israel Garcia does not shy away from the technical dimensions of these cases. We have the resources and the experience to pursue them at that level, even when the trucking company arrives at the table with a full legal team and a team of paid experts.

One often-overlooked angle in Bexar County truck cases involves the negligent entrustment doctrine. Under Texas law, a motor carrier that hires a driver with a documented history of violations, failed drug tests, or insufficient training can be held liable for the driver’s conduct independent of respondeat superior. The driver’s qualification file, which carriers are required to maintain under 49 C.F.R. Part 391, contains the employment application, motor vehicle record, and road test certificate. When those records reveal that a carrier knowingly placed an unqualified driver behind the wheel, the liability exposure expands significantly.

Injuries That Reshape Daily Life, and What Compensation Is Designed to Address

Semi-truck collisions frequently result in injuries that do not stabilize quickly. Traumatic brain injuries, spinal cord damage, complex fractures, and crush injuries to the extremities often require multiple surgeries, extended inpatient rehabilitation, and years of ongoing care. Texas law allows injured victims to pursue economic damages covering past and future medical expenses, lost wages, and diminished earning capacity, alongside non-economic damages for physical pain, mental anguish, and loss of enjoyment of life.

In cases involving gross negligence, such as a carrier that knowingly allowed a driver to operate a mechanically defective vehicle, Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code Section 41.003 permits an award of exemplary damages. These are capped under Texas law at the greater of $200,000 or two times the amount of economic damages plus an amount equal to non-economic damages not to exceed $750,000. Reaching the gross negligence standard requires clear and convincing evidence, which is a higher burden than ordinary negligence, but it is a threshold worth pursuing when the facts support it.

The Law Office of Israel Garcia has recovered millions of dollars for injury victims across South-Central Texas. Our practice covers the full spectrum of injuries that result from commercial truck collisions, including brain and spine injuries, severe fractures, burn injuries, amputations, and wrongful death claims brought on behalf of surviving family members.

Challenging the Defense Strategy That Carrier Insurers Deploy in These Cases

Trucking companies and their insurers operate with a playbook. In the immediate aftermath of a collision, they move to limit the narrative. Their adjusters may contact injured victims directly with early settlement offers designed to resolve claims before the full extent of injuries is known or before an attorney has preserved the critical evidence. Texas law does not prohibit this contact, which makes it genuinely important that injured victims avoid engaging with the carrier’s insurer on their own.

Defense attorneys for large carriers will also scrutinize the plaintiff’s own conduct using Texas’s modified comparative fault framework. Under Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code Section 33.001, a plaintiff who is found more than 50 percent responsible for their own injuries is barred from recovering any damages. A plaintiff found partially at fault receives a proportionally reduced award. This means the defense will comb through the crash scene evidence, the plaintiff’s driving record, and any witness statements looking for anything that can shift the percentage of fault. An experienced truck accident attorney anticipates this approach and builds the evidentiary record accordingly.

Another tactic involves disputing the causal connection between the collision and the plaintiff’s injuries, particularly when the plaintiff had any preexisting medical conditions. Trucking company defense teams frequently hire independent medical examiners who can testify that a plaintiff’s spinal injuries, for example, predate the crash and are not attributable to it. Rebutting this argument requires thorough medical documentation and, in many cases, expert testimony from treating physicians who can speak to the specific mechanism of injury.

Questions About Semi-Truck Accident Claims in Bexar County

What is the statute of limitations for a truck accident claim in Texas?

Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code Section 16.003 establishes a two-year statute of limitations for personal injury claims. The clock generally begins running on the date of the accident. Wrongful death claims are also subject to a two-year limit under Section 16.003(b), running from the date of the decedent’s death. Missing this deadline almost always results in permanent loss of the right to recover.

Can I sue both the driver and the trucking company?

Yes. Texas law allows claims against multiple defendants. The driver may be liable for their own negligent conduct, while the carrier may face liability under respondeat superior for the driver’s actions within the scope of employment, and independently for negligent hiring, training, or supervision under the qualification file requirements in 49 C.F.R. Part 391.

What role does the FMCSA play in my case?

The Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration sets the regulatory standards that define safe commercial trucking operations. Its Safety Measurement System tracks inspection and violation data for individual carriers. FMCSA records showing a pattern of out-of-service violations or failed drug tests can be used as evidence of the carrier’s awareness of ongoing safety problems.

How is fault determined when both a car and a truck were involved?

Texas applies a modified comparative fault standard under Chapter 33 of the Civil Practice and Remedies Code. Each party’s percentage of fault is assessed by the jury. A plaintiff can still recover if they are found 50 percent or less responsible, but their recovery is reduced by their percentage of fault. Thorough accident reconstruction and preservation of electronic truck data are essential to establishing fault accurately.

Does it matter if the truck driver was an independent contractor rather than an employee?

It can, but the trucking industry’s use of independent contractor classifications does not automatically insulate carriers from liability. Courts and juries look at the actual degree of control the carrier exercised over the driver. Additionally, under 49 C.F.R. Part 376, lease agreements between carriers and owner-operators impose specific responsibilities on the carrier regarding the operation of leased vehicles during the lease period.

What electronic data should be preserved after a truck accident?

The Electronic Logging Device records, Engine Control Module data, GPS tracking data, dash camera footage, and any onboard safety system recordings are all potentially critical. Federal regulations require carriers to retain some of this data for limited periods, and without a formal legal hold or spoliation notice, that data can be overwritten or lost. Acting quickly through legal counsel to demand preservation is essential.

Serving Communities Across Bexar County and Surrounding Areas

The Law Office of Israel Garcia represents injury victims throughout Bexar County and the broader South-Central Texas region. Our clients come from communities across the county, including the medical center corridor near the South Texas Medical Center, the fast-growing areas along US-281 North, communities in Helotes and Leon Valley on the county’s northwest edge, and neighborhoods throughout the far southeast side near Converse and Kirby. We also serve clients from Schertz and Universal City along the IH-35 corridor heading toward New Braunfels, as well as those coming from the Southside and Lackland area near Kelly Field Annex. The major freight routes that cross the county, including IH-10, IH-35, Loop 410, and US-90, connect San Antonio to Laredo, Houston, and beyond, and the truck traffic on those corridors is constant. When accidents on those routes affect residents from Floresville in Wilson County, Lytle in Atascosa County, or the communities in Medina County, our office extends its representation to those areas as well.

Speak With a Bexar County Semi-Truck Accident Attorney

The Law Office of Israel Garcia charges no fees unless we win your case. Attorney Israel Garcia has trained at the Trial Lawyers College alongside some of the country’s top litigators and has spent more than two decades building the skills and resources that complex commercial truck cases require. If you were injured in a commercial truck collision in this region, call today to schedule a free consultation with a Bexar County semi-truck accident attorney who has been there personally and professionally and knows exactly what is at stake.

Share This Page:
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn

By submitting this form I acknowledge that form submissions via this website do not create an attorney-client relationship, and any information I send is not protected by attorney-client privilege.

Skip footer and go back to main navigation